Last week, the NYT published an article on the proposed “PROTECT IP Act,” the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011.
The article frames the issue as pitting those in favor of a means to better enforce IP rights on the Internet against those in favor of free Internet. Or to put faces on those interest groups, the Motion Picture Association of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce versus the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Google. That’s how many have couched the debate.
I’m all for a free Internet, believe me. But I’m also (obviously) all for IP rights. And I can say that IP owners are getting killed by overseas infringers — particularly counterfeiters. The article characterizes enforcement efforts through our current system as playing the arcade game of “Whac-a-Mole,” and that’s an apt comparison. It’s a real challenge to enforce a federal court’s injunction against someone who has never set foot in the States, has no bank accounts here, has no property here, and often doesn’t care what a U.S. judge says.
Others are in a better position to discuss the merits of the proposed statute, and the current state of the legislation. I know many are harshly critical of it. But from my daily practice, it is abundantly clear that U.S.-based IP owners need a helping hand. Whether the Protect IP Act is the best way to do that remains an open question.