« Western District Finds No Basis for Declaratory Judgment Claim | Main | Mark Can Be Counterfeit Even When the Genuine Mark Is Not Used on Same Goods »

Congress Passes Anti-Counterfeiting Bill

The “PRO-IP” bill, otherwise known as the “Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008,” passed the House on Sept. 28 and is headed for the White House.

If signed, the bill would revise a number of existing statutes relating to counterfeiting, including the Lanham Act.

Among the highlights:

  • 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b) would be amended to require courts to enter judgment for triple the counterfeiter’s profits or damages, whichever is greater, plus attorney’s fees, unless the court finds extenuating circumstances.
  • 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1) would be amended to double the amount of statutory damages in cases involving counterfeit marks (including a doubling to $2 million per counterfeit mark when use of the counterfeit mark is found to be willful).
  • The position of Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator would be created to coordinate the development of a Joint Strategic Plan against counterfeiting and infringement.
  • The Act would create grants to local law enforcement to help combat counterfeiting and infringement.
  • The Act would direct the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, to ensure that there are “at least 10 additional operational agents” of the FBI designated to support the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice to investigate intellectual property crimes.
  • The Act would provide the FBI and Attorney General with $10 million each to hire and train law enforcement officers to investigate intellectual property crimes and crimes committed through computers.

The bill (S. 3325) passed the Senate by unanimous consent. It passed the House by a vote of 381 to 41.

The White House certainly has bigger problems to worry about these days, but I’d be surprised if it was not quickly signed into law.

Posted on September 30, 2008 by Registered CommenterMichael Atkins in | CommentsPost a Comment

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.