« Seattle Weather Calls to Mind the U.S. Postal Service's Registered Trademarks | Main | Microsoft Appears to Leapfrog Competing ITU Application for Search Engine Mark »

Nintendo Settles Trademark Suit Over "Nunchuck" Game Controller

Redmond, Wash.-based Nintendo of America, Inc., settled its trademark and design patent suit today against Los Angeles-based Nyko Technologies, Inc.

The Western District suit stemmed from Nyko’s “Wireless Nunchuck” game controller (later called “Kama Wireless Nunchuck”) used with Nintendo’s Wii video game console. Nintendo claimed Nyko’s use of NUNCHUCK infringed Nintendo’s use of its own NUNCHUCK registered trademark, which Nintendo also uses in connection with video game controllers.

Nintendo claimed a priority date of November 2006 and that Nyko first used its mark in May 2008.

Nyko counterclaimed for a declaration of noninfringement.

The parties had motions pending at the time they settled. Nintendo had moved for a preliminary injunction. Nyko had moved for summary judgment dismissing Nintendo’s claims for lack of standing.

Terms of the settlement are not public, except for their mutual dismissal of all claims and counterclaims. However, one report states Nyko can continue selling a redesigned version of its controller. A review of Nyko’s Web site also suggests that Nyko has dropped references to “Nunchuck” and that it now calls its controller the “Kama Wireless Controller.”

The case cite is Nintendo of America Inc. v. Nyko Technologies, Inc., No. 08-907 (W.D. Wash.).

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

Ouch! Trademark law is really beyond me. I would have thought 'nunchuck' being a traditional martial arts weapon would make the term general enough for others to use? Or is it because of the capitalization?
December 19, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMark
NUNCHUCK for martial arts weapons would be generic and, therefore, not protectable. However, NUNCHUCK for a video game controller is suggestive or arbitrary, so it is inherently distinctive and, therefore, immediately protectable. The same would be true for APPLE -- not protectable for fruit, but immediately protectable for records and computers.
December 21, 2008 | Registered CommenterMichael Atkins
woww..
trademark law makes me confused..
nintendo claimed NUNCHUCK already registered since november 2006..but Nyko registered since
May 2008.

who first used it??
April 24, 2009 | Unregistered Commenternintendo video games

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.