« Ninth Circuit Finds "First Publication" Exclusion Applies to Infringement Claims | Main | See You in Hawaii! »

Use of Unoriginal Trademarks Risks Confusing Consumers

Dueling USA Networks: the Christian channel I found on vacation (top) 
and the well-known one owned by NBC Universal

I’m back from vacation.

I must say, I didn’t think much about trademark law while I was gone. One of the few times was when I came across a channel called “USA Network” on my hotel TV. I had expected to find edited-for-basic-cable movies and shows like “Monk” that are on the USA Network I get as part of my cable TV package at home. Not so. I instead found what appeared to be a channel offering 24-hour Christian content.

Hmmm. The marks are identical — USA NETWORK— and the services are identical — television services. So are these channels somehow related? I don’t think so, but I can’t tell. I guess you could say that I am confused.

Assuming the marks are not owned by NBC Universal, Inc. (which owns the USA Network I get at home), it may be that USA NETWORK is such a weak (if not downright generic) trademark when used in connection with television services that NBC Universal can’t stop lesser-known competitors from using the identical mark for identical services. If that’s the case, it’s not much of a trademark, is it?

Another possibility is that NBC Universal owns the Christian channel I came across. If that’s the case, NBC Universal is confusing viewers and watering down its own brand. That wouldn’t seem terribly smart.

One lesson to take from this is that a company adopts a weak trademark at its own peril. Why pour money into promoting a mark that you can’t protect? And if you have a protectable mark, don’t weaken it by associating it with incongruous goods or services. Doing so will only confuse consumers. Like me.

Posted on February 8, 2009 by Registered CommenterMichael Atkins in | Comments2 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Michael-
You forgot one additional option; USA NETWORK may have been used in Hawaii (locally) prior to the Big Guy USA moving into Hawaii with its satellite network, and the parties agreed to coexist. Did you see Big Guy USA on TV in Hawaii? Maybe they can't broadcast there (at least under the USA mark).
Another option, of course, is that this Christian network has recently started broadcasting, and you've tipped off NBC to a serious trademark fight...
Welcome home,
Kyle Kaiser
http://arbitrarayandfanciful.wordpress.com
February 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKyle Kaiser
Thanks! Great comment -- I indeed forgot about the scenario you described. Good catch!
February 9, 2009 | Registered CommenterMichael Atkins

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.