« "Dirtiest Hotel" Case Teaches that Brand Owners Shouldn't Sue Over Bad Reviews | Main | To be Protected as a Brand, Artwork Must be Used as a Brand »

Protecting Your Marijuana Trademark

Now that the feds say they’re not going to challenge Washington’s statute legalizing recreational use of marijuana, does that mean you can get a federal registration for your marijuana-related trademark?

Nope.  I would expect the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to continue to deny applications for federal registration of any drug-related trademark that the feds deem to be illegal.

So where does that leave legitimate business owners here who want to maximize protection of their marijuana-related trademarks? There are two broad strategies to consider. First, you should consider getting a state trademark registration. The State of Washington accepts applications for state registration even if they explicitly refer to goods or services involving marijuana, cannabis, and the like. A state registration expands the owner’s trademark rights from the geographic area in which it uses the mark (say, Seattle) to having rights statewide. A registration, therefore, would entitle a trademark owner that sells only in Seattle to complain about a confusingly similar trademark even if the competing trademark is only used in Spokane. Because Washington is one of the few places where providing both medical and recreational marijuana goods and services is legal, it makes sense to focus your trademark protection efforts here.

However, if you really want to expand your rights nationwide, there’s another option. You could consider whether you could register your mark at the federal level in connection with goods or services the PTO would consider legal. If you sell both marijuana-enhanced and ordinary, non-enhanced baked goods, for example, you could legitimately apply to register your trademark in connection with (ordinary, non-enhanced) baked goods. A federal registration would help protect you against other sellers of baked goods who adopt trademarks that are too close to yours anywhere in the United States.

It takes a little strategizing, but there is no reason why those in the legal marijuana industry cannot maximize their trademark rights like other legitimate sellers.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

I can't wait for the names. Here's some inspiration from George Carlin ca 1970. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrVDjxLJuH0
August 31, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMark Nowotarski
Wouldn't the USPTO see this as an attempt to circumvent its rules? It already disallows marks that reference marijuana. Wouldn't the USPTO likely attempt to prevent any protections extending to marijuana? Could the USPTO create guidelines to prevent this "collateral" protection? Is such action likely?

While trademarks in Colorado and Washington make perfect sense, it seems odd that many of these brands will receive protection for goodwill likely built up primarily through illegal conduct. Would/should the illegally created goodwill simply not count?

This is going to be a fun area of law to see develop over the next several years.
September 3, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterDash DeJarnatt
Great points about state trademarks. We regularly push our clients toward state trademarks when federal TM's may take longer than desired for our current enforcement activities.
September 3, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterBrad
Along similar lines, the PTO has issued registrations in the past for marks used in connection with services explicitly related to cannabis, such as "organizing events in the field of cannabis" and the like.
September 30, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMike Matesky

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.